So I did run the benchmark and it does appear that the GPU is faster but when compared against the average for a 4080, my 2k, 2k, and 4k values are alot lower than the 9k average. For reference, during some tests Blender Cycles. Studio Drivers provide maximum reliability so you can focus on your next big idea. Studio Driver is optimized for production software (CAD/CAM/DCC), while Game Ready Driver is otimized for games.

Ray tracing delivers hyper-realistic graphics, and the Studio suite of AI-assisted tools take ideas from concept to completion, faster. It is taking ridiculously longer than when the CPU was rendering, yet the CPU is getting maxed when trying to GPU render. NVIDIA Studio is your creative advantage with state-of-the-art RTX GPUs that power top creative apps. I have OptiX (I have also tried CUDA) NVIDA GeForce RTX 4080 selected in preference and render engine = cycles, Feature Set = supported and Device = GPU Compute. I included my simple file fir debugging as well if that helps at all. I have also tried using some of the benchmark animation files from the blender site, including both the fluid simulation and the lava simulation. Tag your posts w/ StudioShare to be featured munity. The graphics card also has 16G of local ram. Create without limits using NVIDIAStudio systems & GPUs. I have updated the drivers to use the Nvidia Studio drivers. Adobe Premiere Pro measured through Media Encoder using 1080p and. Does the GPU bring no value in faster rendering? Is there anything that could be done to render faster? Blender Cycles OpenData benchmark run with OptiX render engine.

Nvidia studio driver blender